Topic starter
09/11/2024 5:15 am
Imagine this: you’re five hours into a tattoo session, and your artist casually mentions he didn’t draw your design himself. Instead, he used AI to create that intricate gothic sword you’ll now wear for life. That’s exactly what happened to Kaarina Vuorinen, and it’s sparking a debate. Some tattoo fans feel that AI-designed tattoos are like "sports on steroids"—not quite authentic. Others argue it’s fair game. But here’s the twist: some say AI-generated images just don’t translate well to ink. So, would you go AI for something permanent?
